Lesson 7: Self Awareness Attention To this day the 'mirror test' remains the best experiment yet developed for examining the emergence of self-concept in infants. Learning Outcomes Upon completion of this lesson's material, students will be able to:
Teaching Most people look out for number one, themselves, which makes it strange to think that there was ever a time when we had no concept of 'me'. A simple study dating from the early 70s suggests that before the age of around two years old we can't recognize ourselves in the mirror. Because of this study, and the many variations that have followed, some claim that it isn't until our second birthday that our self-concept emerges. A smudge of rouge on the nose In 1972 Beulah Amsterdam from the University of North Carolina published a study that has kicked-off decades of research on self-recognition (Amsterdam, 1972). The study's procedure was simple. Infants between the ages of 6 and 24 months were placed in front of a mirror after a spot of rouge had been surreptitiously put on their noses. Then their mothers pointed to the reflection in the mirror and asked the child: "Who's that?". Researchers than watched infants' behavior. After testing 88 infants Amsterdam could only obtain reliable data on 16 of them - infants will be infants and many didn't want to play. From these 16 infants Amsterdam found three categories of response:
Although Amsterdam's results were from a small sample size, they have subsequently been repeated with many more participants. Also, later studies with control conditions have found infants in this age-range don't touch their nose if it isn't marked with rouge. This showed that touching the nose isn't somehow a natural reaction for infants to seeing own reflection. Self-concept or just self-recognition? Of course this study simplifies a mass of psychological complexity. Psychologists have raised all sorts of questions about what the mirror test reveals. It could be, for example, that infants just don't understand faces particularly well until they are around two years old. Perhaps, then, they develop a self-concept at a much earlier stage. Alternatively it could be that at around two years old infants develop a solid physical or visual self-concept, but still have little mental self-concept. In this case all the test is showing is that we know what we look like; perhaps we don't develop our self-concept until much later in life. Results are especially ambiguous because only limited tests can be carried out on children. These are just two common explanations, I'm sure you can think of more alternatives. This multitude of possibilities illustrates one of the major hurdles in child psychology: results are especially ambiguous because only limited tests can be carried out on children. Still, despite these alternatives, the mirror test has proved remarkably hardy over the years and is still used today while other tests have fallen by the wayside. The social child One of the reasons for its resilience is that it seems likely that self-concept might well emerge at this age from all the other things we know about children. It is from around 2 to 4 years of age that children start to display a rapid increase in their social behavior. Being able to distinguish yourself from other people is fundamental to successful social relationships rather than simple interactions. It seems unlikely that infants would be able to build relationships with others without some limited concept of themselves. Being able to distinguish yourself from other people is fundamental to successful social relationships. The mirror test has also been used on other animals to test their self-concept, indeed the test was originally carried out on chimpanzees by Professor Gordon Gallup a few years before Amsterdam. All the great apes 'pass' the test, along with dolphins, whales and elephants. In one recent study an 8ft mirror was placed in the elephant enclosure at New York's Bronx Zoo and the elephants had marks painted on their heads. Researchers who kept watch on the elephants' reactions saw them touch the paint marks on their own heads. It's no coincidence that elephants, like the other animals that pass the test, have complex social systems. Basic self-recognition is key to being able to relate to others; with this knowledge infants take their first faltering steps into the social world. (http://www.spring.org.uk/2008/05/when-self-emerges-is-that-me-in-mirror.php) Theory of Mind As children gain insight into themselves they also begin to realize that people have thoughts, beliefs, and intentions. They also begin to understand that thoughts, beliefs, and intentions often cause people to behave the way they do. This is the first appearance of "perspective taking" which is a critical part of moral development...which we will study later in this class. Between the ages of 2 and 5 children develop Theory of Mind. TOM is defined as a naive understanding of the relationship between a person's mind and their behavior. Consider the following experiment:
Looking Glass Self LGS is a concept that arises from the field of Sociology. A researcher by the name of Charles Horton Cooley. LGS is the self individuals form by imagining what others think about his or her behavior and appearance. "I am not what I think I am and I am not what you think I am; I am what I think that you think I am." Assessment Lesson 7 Quiz
Sally was 3 years old and was playing with her dog Fido in the living room of her house. Exploring the room she began to climb on a small table on which was placed a lamp. The lamp fell and broke on the floor. Sally’s mom came into the room and asked what happened. Sally was quiet for a short time and then said, “Fido knocked the lamp down”. Keep this in mind...all the information you need to answer this question is in the little story. You don't need to speculate about ANYTHING. Possible In-Class Discussion Share early experiences of Looking Glass Self from your own history. If you have begun your interview for the Biography, ask your subject if they remember a time when others' opinions of them shaped their opinions of themselves. What has happened since then? How do others' opinions shape your thoughts of yourself? Does it matter WHO's opinion it is?
|