Lesson 7: Thinking and Intelligence Attention Click on the logo to Psychology Today magazine for a list of articles related to Intelligence Learning Outcomes Upon completion of this lesson's material, students will be able to:
Teaching How would you measure Intelligence? What is smart? Consider the most intelligent person you know...why is this person intelligent, or why do they come across as intelligent? Are they good at one particular thing? Are they good at many things? Do they "talk intelligent"? Do they have a lot of "street smarts"? Do they have a lot of degrees? How we define this well known concept is the topic of much research and debate within Psychology. What is Normal (The Normal Curve) Normal is defined in a number of ways:
Intelligence is a great subject to discuss Normal and Abnormal because the terms are easily understood as use them all the time.
Intelligence has been defined in many ways...consult your text to learn about the following ways in which Intelligence has been defined:
Sternberg on the Triarchic Theory of Intelligence
Howard Gardiner on Multiple Intelligence
Click HERE to take a Multiple Intelligence test based on Gardiner's theory! Concepts One of the leading researchers in cognition is Jean Piaget...we learn a lot about him in Developmental Psychology. He referred to "concepts" as "schemas". They are simply the ideas and definitions we have about things. As we develop we learn the names and properties of things and we develop these "schemas". These schemas are modified as we experience more in the world through the processes of "assimilation" (the construction of new schemas) and "accommodation" (the modification or elaboration of existing schemas). For example: Some of you may be into plants and flowers, but likely all of you know what a flower is. For most of you the "schema" of flower may be fairly simple but those who are "into" them, the schema would be very complex. Basically, the definition of an EXPERT is one who has a highly defined schema for something! Solving Problems Psychology sets out to study how we solve problems by defining how we go about doing that...there are two general categories of ways in which we solve problems:
Although the process leading to the development of psychological research is highly heuristic, most research is algorithmic. By adopting fixed methods for research we limit the number of errors we make. For example, we may intuitively know why relationships "break up" based on our experiences and we may "heuristically" come to conclusions, but these may be in error...we research why relationships "break up" my methodically reviewing all the different reasons, surveys, etc. etc. etc. This is why when we sometimes read psychological literature we wonder..."Who cares" or "How am I supposed to USE this information?"...the point is that when we go to apply psychological information we need to use Heuristics approaches to accommodate for the individual differences in the situation. The Wikipedia link for Heuristics has a nice list of well-known and lesser known approaches to problem solving. Creativity "Creative Thinking" is a combination of flexibility in thinking and reorganization of understanding to produce innovative ideas and new or novel solutions.
Language and Thought One of the more interesting ideas is the exploration of how language impacts thought. For example: If I'm in a classroom and I say "OK, all of you guys need to come with me to the library right now so we can see how to search for articles." I then leave the room and the entire class would follow me to the library. However, if I said "OK, all of you ladies need to come with me to the library right now so we can see how to search for articles." only the women would follow me. The question is: "Does the fact that women include themselves among the "guys" in the first statement suggest anything about how they think about gender? Is this part of a patriarchal system? Is there anything "wrong" with this? Researches look at the use of words to identify ways in which they may impact our thinking....Linguistic Relativity is the concept that differences among language result in differences in how people think about and perceive the world. Assessment In this section you will find a list of the required Assessments that accompany this Lesson. The Lesson Discussions are designed for the ONLINE and HYBRID versions of this course. If you are not in an ONLINE or HYBRID version of this course you can ignore these instructions unless otherwise guided by your instructor. Lesson 7 Discussion A For this particular discussion I want you to go Online and take an IQ test. www.iqtest.com From this same site you can visit pages that discuss... Now that you have your IQ score according to this test examine the two major theories of intelligence are those proposed by Gardner and Sternberg above. Discuss how the IQ test is different from the types of Intelligence that are proposed by Gardner and Sternberg. What does this mean in terms of the relationship between the definitions of intelligence and the validity of intelligence tests? Do you think your IQ is an accurate portrayal of your true intelligence, or do you think a test based on Gardner or Sternberg's theory would be better? Why? Since I would not dare to have you do anything I would not do myself... Lesson 7 Discussion B In this discussion I would like you to come up with an example of a schema that you feel you are fairly expert at. For example, let's say you have been raising horses for years and you have ridden in many competitions. You have a relatively "expert" level of understanding of the schema of "horse". In your post describe how you remember going from a relatively simple understanding of your schema (ex: When you were young what did you understand about horses?) to a relatively complex level of understanding (ex: What do you know now about horses?) Support one another's efforts to identify what you are an expert at. As you make your way through your career you start in college and then move into the workplace gradually building up enough experience and knowledge to become an expert...I think it takes about 10 years of doing something to be an expert at it.
|