This is a summary of the article Civic Prompts: Making Civic Learning Routine Across the Disciplines
Author: Caryn McTighe Musil, Ph.D.
Publisher: Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U)
Click here for the full article
This report grew out of a McCormick Foundation-funded project called “Civic Inquiry and Action Across the Disciplines.” AAC&U worked with seven Chicago-area colleges and universities to explore how civic learning fits into every academic major, not just political science or history. Musil directs Civic Learning and Democracy Initiatives at AAC&U and also authored the 2012 report A Crucible Moment: College Learning and Democracy’s Future, which forms the intellectual backbone of this publication.
Core argument
The report cites a 1947 recommendation from the President’s Commission on Higher Education: colleges should instill democratic values in every field of study, not just civics-related ones. A Crucible Moment renewed that call in 2012, urging faculty to define the public purposes of their disciplines and build civic learning outcomes into every major. Musil argues that civic education has drifted to the margins of most fields. Graduate training narrows faculty focus to disciplinary content, and civic dimensions get left out even when the material invites them.
A broader definition of civic learning
The report rejects a narrow view of civic learning as just voting knowledge or basic government facts. It proposes a four-part framework:
– Knowledge: familiarity with democratic texts, historical movements, and diverse cultures and value systems
– Skills: critical reasoning, quantitative analysis, multi-perspective evaluation, and collaborative decision making
– Values: respect for human dignity, empathy, tolerance, and responsibility to the common good
– Collective action: moral discernment, navigating political systems, and public problem solving with diverse partners
This framework opens civic learning to every discipline, including STEM and arts and humanities fields that rarely frame their work in civic terms.
Four markers of a civic-minded campus
Musil outlines what she calls a civic-minded institution:
1. Civic ethos: democratic values embedded in everyday campus practices and interactions
2. Civic literacy: foundational knowledge of democratic principles and historical struggles
3. Civic inquiry: exploration of the public consequences of a subject, built into majors and general education
4. Civic action: sustained capacity to work with diverse others on shared problems
She also charts the shift from “partial” to “pervasive” civic learning. In a partial model, civic learning is optional, one-time, and individually focused. In a pervasive model, it’s expected of all students, developmentally staged across their studies, and built through partnerships between academic and student affairs.
The disciplinary clusters
AAC&U organized faculty into four clusters: arts and humanities, STEM, social sciences, and business/pre-professional fields. Each cluster, led by a national consultant, identified pedagogies already supporting civic learning. Arts and humanities faculty named reflection papers, role playing, and oral histories. STEM faculty pointed to problem-based learning, fieldwork, and case studies. Social sciences faculty cited the Socratic method, simulations, and structured volunteer work. Business and pre-professional faculty emphasized problem-based learning tied to real community issues, internships with reflective components, and community-led courses.
One notable finding: arts and humanities faculty largely overlooked civic action as an outcome, while STEM faculty largely overlooked civic values. Both groups found this gap uncomfortable once named, and both began rethinking how to cover all four dimensions of the framework.
The Civic Prompts themselves
The report’s practical core is a set of seven discussion prompts designed for faculty groups of eight to twelve people, meant to run within a department or across several. They ask faculty to:
1. Identify which parts of the 21st-century civic framework their discipline already emphasizes
2. Draft lines of civic inquiry specific to their field
3. Name recurring big issues in their courses that carry civic weight
4. Match civic pedagogies, including high-impact practices like service learning and undergraduate research, to their discipline
5. Review assignments that already generate civic questioning, or could be adapted to
6. List potential forms of civic action students could take on within the major
7. Consider what role their national disciplinary society plays or could play in supporting civic learning
Each prompt includes a suggested group exercise and follow-up discussion questions, aimed at surfacing civic content that faculty may not have named explicitly before.
Supporting context
Musil references AAC&U’s twelve high-impact educational practices (first documented by George Kuh), noting that six of them, including service learning, diversity courses, and study abroad, carry built-in civic outcomes that can be strengthened with intentional design. She also cites the American Political Science Association’s 2013 volume on teaching civic engagement as a model other disciplinary societies could follow.
Closing point
Musil frames the major as the place where students spend the bulk of their academic time and where their professional identity takes shape. If civic learning stays confined to general education or extracurricular programs, most students graduate without ever connecting their field of study to public life. The report closes by inviting faculty to send their own findings to AAC&U, with the goal of building a national database of civic practices across disciplines.